Development
emerges, with different forms and various processes, in line with perpetually
changing environments ranging from household, communal, social, & national level
to international level in relation to demographic, geographic, economic, political,
and social changes. In this scenario migration has become one of the big issues
repeatedly debated in development paradigm, in Nepal and around the world. Migration of our time is not only fast moving but
also posing significant developmental implications; challenges for governments,
organizing, regularizing and managing it, around the world.
Most of the
discussions on migration advocate for the idea that migration contributes to
secure livelihood (IOM, 2003) but very limited or
no recognition of security and right for migrants in destination has casted
serious doubt concerning the positive impacts of migration. Increasing trends
of both ‘pull’ and ‘push’ factors of migration at home and destinations have
created tragic-comedy for migrants. Migrants at most of the destination have
little or no recognition as human beings and they are extremely vulnerable to
various discrimination and abuses. Most of the sources of migrants are
indifferent to formulate the effective plans and policies in order to protect
their citizens working in overseas by providing legal and institutional back
up.
Majority of the
people migrating these days belong to developing world (Hass, 2007) that has heterogeneous
characteristics of development compelling developing countries to compete even
in exporting labor force to developed economies. Competition among the labor sending countries
results on acute shortage of coordination concerning elimination of discrimination,
exploitation and respect of human rights as well as rights of migrant workers
at international domain that provides them less protection (IOM, 2003) . They have not only
been victims of various conditions but also exposed to different
vulnerabilities, in this situation there are clear limits to what the state can
protect its migrant workers without active coordination of the country of
destination.
Migration is on
the top of the policy agendas of almost all countries of origin, transit, and
destination but the dilemma of ‘promotion’ of migration at home versus
‘protection’ of basic human rights at destination has made the whole migration
process a complex issue for sustainable growth and inclusive development. It
becomes very hot topic in every sphere of state-communities as the issues
related to increased mobility of migrants come to the surface while its veneer
of importance gets cast off as the issues of rights and facilities of migrants
in both ends come to the surface.
Hein de Hass
(2007) argues that despite of being risk spreading livelihood strategy
migration has potentials to improve wellbeing, stimulate economic growth and
reduce poverty but its effects on inequality and security are much more
ambiguous (Hass, 2007) . Generally households
pursue migration as their livelihood strategy since little cash income plays
vital role to reduce their risks of seasonality, harvest failure, food
insecurity and other market constraints and sometimes it happens due to
interactions between social structures and agencies (Gurung, 2008) . Talking about the consequences,
critics of migration argue that it only brings illusive changes which are
temporal since it increases dependency on remittances even to meet small needs.
Governments of developing countries are overestimating the contribution of
current remittances in state development while it has played pivotal role only in
changing the taste and consumption pattern of migrants and their families.
Traditional growth theory has idealized migration but in reality migration and
its benefits have been disproportionately distributed to different strata of
the same society. Consequently, benefits from and access to migration for poor
people and poor countries are very rare. At this point it will be hilarious to
advocate inclusive development from the perspective of migration.
Current debate
on migration is focusing too much only on economic dimension of development
leaving all other non-pecuniary implications created directly or indirectly by
migration. Migration is not only livelihood strategy getting out of the market constraints;
but also it is the route widening social disparities simultaneously. Therefore,
development in terms of migration is not straightforward but spatially
heterogeneous (Hass, 2007) . Currently migration
is at the top of the discussion agendas of developmental, intellectual and
academic domain in Nepal. Remittance is said to have played crucial role in
reducing poverty in Nepal. Out migration from Nepal is on rise and inflow of
remittance is very high but condition of the Nepalese individuals working
abroad is very poignant. Nepal is still in Political stalemate despite of the
breakthrough of peace in 2006 after decade long People’s war. Consequently
Nepal, as other developing countries, has not been able to take necessary
initiative to address problems of migrants. Migration provides promising ways
to get out of substantial un-freedoms only for short term yet it is not
reliable source of economic growth in the longer term. The challenges have
accelerated by increased pressure to migrate at home and restrictive policies
at destination. Moreover migration is vulnerable to be affected by national and
international environments. In such situation it is obvious to have questions
like:
-How migration
could contribute to the sustainable development in developing countries like
Nepal?
-Why migration
has contributed so much for some and very little or no or even negatively for
other countries/societies?
Works Cited
Gurung, Y. B. (2008). Migration from Rural Nepal:
A Social Exclusion Framework.
Hass, H. d. (2007). Remittance, Migration and Social Development: A
Conceptual Review of the Literature.
IOM, I. O. (2003). Labour Migration in Asia: Trends and challenges and
Policy Responces in Countries of origin. Switzrerland: IOM.
(Note: this article is previously published on the Blog: http://development-topics.blogspot.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment